Women Are Not Worthy of Life - Or So Some Ancient Dick Said: Life in the Simulated Reality Matrix (SRM)
Disclaimer
Disclaimer: This post is not misogynistic, far from it, so if you don't understand what it is you're reading about, please refrain from commenting from your sleepwalking perspective. I believe in women, believe in love. It's this world and what controls it that hates both - or at least hates us for believing in both.
How I got there isn't important, but I was led from Devo to Soundgarden doing Devo - and with both bands knowing what the lyrics to Girl U Want mean in a way few do.
Disclaimer: This post is not misogynistic, far from it, so if you don't understand what it is you're reading about, please refrain from commenting from your sleepwalking perspective. I believe in women, believe in love. It's this world and what controls it that hates both - or at least hates us for believing in both.
How I got there isn't important, but I was led from Devo to Soundgarden doing Devo - and with both bands knowing what the lyrics to Girl U Want mean in a way few do.
Love-bite, anybody? The more I learn the worse the truth becomes. I'd even venture to say that the death of dudes like Chris Cornell and Anthony Bourdain can be linked to "Devo women," to coin a term. Beta Bitch is another. However, knowing what I know, it also means that there is a lot I don't know, by this I mean I stand by women. But something is very very wrong. If Hesiod was around, I'd ask him. And Plato, of course, in the Republic says that Women are worthy of being guardians too. I think, however, he suggests that only the "philosophical" have what it takes. In turn, that puts me in mind of the Gospel of Thomas, which goes like this:
Simon Peter said to them, “Let Mary leave us, for women are not worthy of life.” Jesus said, “I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the kingdom of heaven.” (Thomas 114)[1]
This suggest there exists in this world two kinds of women. I think I believe it. BUT: I think there also exists two kinds of men. If you are running a divide and conquer operation - and you know how to exploit the human ego and pit one sex against the other - a second kind of each sex could cause a lot of damage. If women are running around thinking men are robots [mere playthings] and men are running around thinking women are robots [mere playthings] then you have succeeded in your agenda of divide and conquer. And it all gets better, if you're the agenda setter, when you encourage a shift from patriarchy to matriarchy. Because, now, women don't need men - and in the past, men believed women were only good for one thing. What I'm getting at here is that the smartest men and women of this world are - I believe - getting played for fools. But the "proof" being used to convince them to make the mistake they are making is highly convincing. And the keystone holding the entire structure of this agenda together is a simple one - secrecy. Imagine the majority of women in this world [not the second kind] holding the secret belief that all men are nothing more than machines. Imagine men doing the same thing. And imagine an unseen intelligence between them encouraging both sexes to devalue the other based on such a belief. Divide and conquer succeeds as an operation: male/female relationships destroyed, love destroyed, the human heart destroyed.
Crosses - This is a Trick
Crosses - This is a Trick
Comments
Post a Comment